public class Solution {
public int[] intersection(int[] nums1, int[] nums2) {
Set<Integer> set = new HashSet<>();
Set<Integer> intersect = new HashSet<>();
for (int i = 0; i < nums1.length; i++) {
set.add(nums1[i]);
}
for (int i = 0; i < nums2.length; i++) {
if (set.contains(nums2[i])) {
intersect.add(nums2[i]);
}
}
int[] result = new int[intersect.size()];
int i = 0;
for (Integer num : intersect) {
result[i++] = num;
}
return result;
}
}
Sort both arrays, use two pointers
Time complexity: O(nlogn)
Seems fastest in OJ (2ms)
public class Solution {
public int[] intersection(int[] nums1, int[] nums2) {
Set<Integer> set = new HashSet<>();
Arrays.sort(nums1);
Arrays.sort(nums2);
int i = 0;
int j = 0;
while (i < nums1.length && j < nums2.length) {
if (nums1[i] < nums2[j]) {
i++;
} else if (nums1[i] > nums2[j]) {
j++;
} else {
set.add(nums1[i]);
i++;
j++;
}
}
int[] result = new int[set.size()];
int k = 0;
for (Integer num : set) {
result[k++] = num;
}
return result;
}
}
Binary search
Time complexity: O(nlogn)
public class Solution {
public int[] intersection(int[] nums1, int[] nums2) {
Set<Integer> set = new HashSet<>();
Arrays.sort(nums2);
for (Integer num : nums1) {
if (binarySearch(nums2, num)) {
set.add(num);
}
}
int i = 0;
int[] result = new int[set.size()];
for (Integer num : set) {
result[i++] = num;
}
return result;
}
public boolean binarySearch(int[] nums, int target) {
int low = 0;
int high = nums.length - 1;
while (low <= high) {
int mid = low + (high - low) / 2;
if (nums[mid] == target) {
return true;
}
if (nums[mid] > target) {
high = mid - 1;
} else {
low = mid + 1;
}
}
return false;
}
}
Java 8 Using Stream
Set<Integer> set = Arrays.stream(nums2).boxed().collect(Collectors.toSet());
return Arrays.stream(nums1).distinct().filter(e -> set.contains(e)).toArray();